ASIL determination

Articles, guides, and products tagged "ASIL determination" — a combined view of every catalogue resource on this topic.

User guide

Human factors & ergonomics engineering of an electric scooter as the 30th engineering axis: human-machine fit axis — ISO 9241 series + ISO 7250-1:2017 + ISO/TR 7250-2:2010 + ISO 11226 + ISO 11228 + ISO 14738 + ANSI/HFES 100 + ANSI/HFES 200 + DIN 33402-2 + IEC 62366-1:2015 + ISO 26262-3:2018 controllability + ISO 2631-1 WBV + ISO 7730 thermal comfort + ISO 8995 lighting + WCAG 2.2 + SAE J2944 + NHTSA Driver Distraction Guidelines

Engineering deep-dive into human factors and ergonomics as the 30th engineering axis and 13th cross-cutting infrastructure axis — describes how the fit between rider and scooter is systematically engineered: anthropometric percentile coverage (P5–P95), postural envelope for the standing rider, control reach and grip dimensions (ISO 7250-1), display glance-time and character size (ISO 9241-300 series), cognitive workload and situation awareness, controllability classification C0/C1/C2/C3 for ASIL determination (ISO 26262-3 Annex B), whole-body vibration exposure limits (ISO 2631-1), thermal comfort PMV/PPD (ISO 7730), lighting (ISO 8995), accessibility target size + contrast (WCAG 2.2), driver-distraction lexicon (SAE J2944) and the NHTSA Driver Distraction Guidelines. Covers ISO 9241 series (usability definitions + interaction principles + HCD principles + HCD process + displays + input devices); ISO 7250-1 + ISO/TR 7250-2 anthropometry; ISO 11226 static postures + ISO 11228 manual handling 4-part; ISO 14738 workstation; ANSI/HFES 100 + 200; DIN 33402-2; IEC 62366-1 medical-device usability engineering methodology (applicable beyond medical); 29-row cross-axis matrix maps the ergonomics concept onto each of the 29 prior engineering axes; 8-step DIY owner ergonomic-fit checklist; 16 numbered sections.

15 min read

User guide

E-scooter risk management engineering as the 32nd engineering axis: risk-anticipation meta-axis — ISO 31000:2018 + ISO/IEC 31010:2019 + ISO Guide 73:2009 + Bowtie + ALARP + SFAIRP + LOPA + HAZOP IEC 61882 + FTA IEC 61025 + ETA IEC 62502 + FMEA IEC 60812 + ISO 14971:2019 + ERM COSO 2017 + Kaplan & Garrick 1981 triplet

Engineering deep-dive into risk-management engineering as the 32nd engineering axis and the 15th cross-cutting infrastructure axis — describes the systematic methodology for identification + analysis + evaluation + treatment + monitoring of risks layered over all the other axes: ISO 31000:2018 *Risk management — Guidelines* (8 principles + framework with 6 components + risk-management process with 7 stages), ISO Guide 73:2009 *Risk management — Vocabulary* (61 terms with risk / hazard / consequence / likelihood definitions), ISO/IEC 31010:2019 *Risk assessment techniques* with 41 assessment techniques, Kaplan & Garrick 1981 triplet definition «What scenario? How likely? What consequences?», ALARP (As Low As Reasonably Practicable) + SFAIRP (So Far As Is Reasonably Practicable) UK HSE principles + reverse burden of proof, risk appetite vs risk tolerance ISO 31000 vocabulary distinction, IEC 31010 risk matrix + heat map + risk register tools, HAZOP IEC 61882:2016 deviation/guide-word inductive process-hazard methodology, FMEA IEC 60812:2018 inductive component-level failure-mode analysis, FTA IEC 61025:2006 deductive top-down boolean-logic event-tree, ETA IEC 62502:2010 inductive consequence-tree with branching on mitigation success/failure, Bowtie methodology (CGE Risk Management Solutions formalized 1990s) — combines threats + barriers (preventive + recovery) + consequences around a central top event, LOPA (Layer of Protection Analysis) CCPS 2001 semi-quantitative methodology with IPL (Independent Protection Layer) credit, ISO 14971:2019 *Application of risk management to medical devices* (cross-industry inspiration), ERM (Enterprise Risk Management) COSO 2017 framework with 5 components + 20 principles, 3 Lines of Defense model IIA Position Paper 2013 (updated 2020), risk-based thinking ISO 9001:2015 clause 6.1 + IATF 16949 cross-link, ISO 26262 HARA + ISO 21434 TARA cybersecurity cross-link, ISO 31000:2009 → 2018 simplification (from 11 principles to 8). 31-row cross-axis matrix maps the risk-management concept to each of the 31 prior engineering axes (battery thermal runaway = LOPA with multiple IPLs; brake failure = FTA top event; tire blowout = Bowtie threats+barriers+consequences; ...); 8-step DIY owner risk-management 'tells' checklist (recall registry tracking + safety-related characteristic markings + manufacturer field-issue subscription + warranty RCA depth + accident statistics transparency).

15 min read